Gender and development: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:53, 23 September 2022

Revision as of 03:56, 23 September 2022

Line 141:

===Dependency theory===

Dependency theorists opposed that liberal development models, including the attempt to incorporate women into the existing global capitalism, was, in fact, nothing more than the "development of [[underdevelopment]]."<ref>{{cite book|last=Frank|first=Andre Gunder|title=Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America : historical studies of Chile and Brazil|url=https://archive.org/details/capitalismunderd00fran|url-access=registration|year=1969|publisher=Monthly Review P.|___location=New York|isbn=978-0853450931|edition= Rev. and enl.}}</ref> This view led them to propose that delinking from the structural oppression of [[global capitalism]] is the only way to achieve balanced human development.

In the 1980s, there also emerged "a sustained questioning by [[post-structuralist]] critics of the development paradigm as a narrative of progress and as an achievable enterprise."<ref>{{cite book |last=al.]Ghosh |first=editedJayati by Nalini Visvanathan ... [et|title=The womenWomen, genderGender and developmentDevelopment Reader |date= reader|publisher=Zed Books |___locationyear=London2011 |isbn=97818481358719781780321387 |editor-last=Visvanathan |editor-first=Nalini |edition=2nd |___location=London |page=29 |editionchapter=Financial crises and the impact on woman: a historical note 2nd|dateeditor-last2=2011Duggan |editor-08first2=Lynn |editor-15last3=Wiegersma |editor-first3=Nan |editor-last4=Nisonoff |editor-first4=Laurie}}</ref>

===Basic Needs Approach, Capability Approach, and Ecofeminism===