:: I used word ''may''. I do not work with CSS or the engines and have no opinion on current article accuracy. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 20:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]. --[[User:Voidxor|Voidxor]] 04:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - If it gets deleted, then not even the links at the bottom of the page will work because they won't be there. One might aws well argue: delete the whole of wikipedia because it can't keep up. But would it be overly optimistic to suggest that perhaps people will update this page from time to time. Who's to say other web sites will keep up either? I came back here today specifically to look for this page and see if it contained an update for IE7 and wouldn't have been happy if it had been deleted. If something is true and can easily be demonstrated to be true then that isn't original research either, regardless of whether anyone else has said it's true or not. It is absurd to apply the 'no original research' argument to prevent straightforward knowledge (not specuative claptrap) being preserved and communicated. [[User:Matthew Stannard|Matt Stan]] 23:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
