Revision as of 15:43, 6 March 2022 edit Meno25 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 216,383 edits Assessment: +Computing: class=List (assisted) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:33, 29 September 2022 edit undo CaliViking (talk \| contribs) 136 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 121: == Missing other Protocol Buffers flavors == To be complete, FlatBuffers (http://google.github.io/flatbuffers/) and Cap'N Proto (https://capnproto.org/) could be mentiond. [[Special:Contributions/128.237.28.16\|128.237.28.16]] ([[User talk:128.237.28.16\|talk]]) 16:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Agree. [[Cap'n Proto]] is very interesting and would be a good comparison. I do not have enough in-depth knowledge to create an official entry. [[User:CaliViking\|CaliViking]] ([[User talk:CaliViking\|talk]]) 18:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC) == Misleading "Standardized?" Column == Line 142 ⟶ 144: https://github.com/edn-format/edn <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/164.144.252.29\|164.144.252.29]] ([[User talk:164.144.252.29\|talk]]) 18:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :EDN seems to have an article here: [[Extensible Data Notation]]. [[Special:Contributions/50.53.1.21\|50.53.1.21]] ([[User talk:50.53.1.21\|talk]]) 22:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC) == Missing [[Cap'n Proto]] == Looks very interesting. I don't have the in-depth knowledge to write a good entry. Creator of the format is very knowledgeable in the field as the primary author of Proto Buffers version 2. See also https://capnproto.org/ , https://github.com/capnproto/ , https://groups.google.com/g/capnproto [[User:CaliViking\|CaliViking]] ([[User talk:CaliViking\|talk]]) 18:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC) == External links modified ==

Talk:Comparison of data-serialization formats: Difference between revisions