Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m SteveLoughran didn't sign: "→The criticisms and success sections: " |
|||
Line 52:
:I agree, these two sections are full of contradictory statements. A neutral reader will end it up wondering if CORBA was really successful or a real failure at all. Also found the section for Success lacking for not citing enough references. ([[User:SirGalahad|SirGalahad]] 21:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC))
: I dont think the article can argue Waldo's A note on distributed computing is biased. His paper is the seminal "limitations of dist-comp" paper and was written while Sun were wholeheartedly backing CORBA -they were one of the co-founders of the OMG, after all. Java RMI came along a lot later; Java ships with a (dated) ORB and even EJB defaults to IIOP as its protocol. Admittedly the paper applies to more than just CORBA; it applies to anything that tries to make remote stuff look local (SOAP, Java RMI, DCOM). But it is valid in Corba, because a corba OID doesnt include any ___location hints at all; you have to use an Orb to find things. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:SteveLoughran|SteveLoughran]] ([[User talk:SteveLoughran|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SteveLoughran|contribs]]) 12:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
| |||