Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2022 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Comments (JJMC89): response to Vermont, specific to OC |
|||
Line 120:
:#:I think all this ultimately distills down to: if a case involves a suspected undisclosed paid editing operation, weight behavioural evidence more highly and bear in mind the potential setup of such organisations when reviewing technical evidence. Conferring with CheckUsers experienced in detecting UPE would also be a solid idea. [[User:Firefly|<span style="color:#850808;">firefly</span>]] <small>( [[User talk:Firefly|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Firefly|c]] )</small> 08:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
:#Aside from suspecting sockpuppetry, what do you believe are standard criteria for applying an indef {{tl|checkuserblock}} to an established user or long term multi-year {{tl|checkuserblock}} to a busy mobile range? [[User:NYC Guru|NYC Guru]] ([[User talk:NYC Guru|talk]]) 05:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
:#:<small>I think you mean {{tl|checkuserblock-account}} for the account, but it's a minor difference for your question.<small> -- [[User talk:AmandaNP|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b> (she/her)</span>]] 08:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
=====Comments (Firefly)=====
| |||