Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIIG Problem Solving Method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
BIIG Problem Solving Method: Amend; the journal claims to have peer reviewed, but it's still junk.
Line 13:
* '''Delete''' --[[user:MdaNoman|'''<span style="font-family:Cursive; color:#F50" lang="en">Noman</span>''']]☆ <span style="font-size:85%;">([[User talk: MdaNoman |Talk]])</span> 17:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC) <!--VCB MdaNoman-->
*'''Delete''', predatory-journal source, fails [[WP:GNG]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The references are an article in a journal that is predatory and not peer-reviewed, a churnalism-style blurb by the author of said article, and a piece that doesn't even discuss the topic specifically. Spam masquerading as an article. --<span style="font-family:Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<strong style="color:blue">Kinu</strong>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<i style="color: red">t</i>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<i style="color:red">c</i>]]</sub></span> 03:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)