Content deleted Content added
→Trashcan: Re why not use Amiga magazines? |
→Trashcan: Reply |
||
Line 24:
An example of how Wikipedia is completely unsuitable for publishing anything Amiga-related, due to the paucity of modern third-party references. Citation is needed but can never be supplied. [[Special:Contributions/2.217.212.107|2.217.212.107]] ([[User talk:2.217.212.107|talk]]) 14:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
:Amiga magazines of the 80s/90s are suitable as reliable sources... so check your library and provide needed sources. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
::Amiga magazines rarely go into the technical detail required. [[Special:Contributions/146.191.95.1|146.191.95.1]] ([[User talk:146.191.95.1|talk]]) 13:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||