:* "Your best bet", and the first thing on that site is a link requesting money donations. Looks like link spam, so no. [[User:Fbergo|Fbergo]] ([[User talk:Fbergo|talk]]) 12:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
:* You are a good hunter of those... I never noticed it without you pointing out. BTW Wikipedia has an equally unobtrusive Donate link on the sidebar... so what. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/193.245.81.13|193.245.81.13]] ([[User talk:193.245.81.13#top|talk]]) 18:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Nonsense claim in the metaprogramming section ==
"To implement the equivalent in many other languages, the programmer would have to write each method (in_black, in_red, in_green, etc.) separately."
That is absurd: I have worked in over a dozen languages, and I can't think of one of them where one would need to write a method per color! In C, for instance, you would write a print_in_color() function, and pass in an array index (e.g., 'BLUE') for which HTML code you wanted to output. This appears to have been written by someone who has not programmed in any language but Ruby. [[User:GeneCallahan|GeneCallahan]] ([[User talk:GeneCallahan|talk]]) 19:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
:I'm certainly no fan of Ruby (currently struggling with it for work...) but this claim seems legitimate. The result is that the user can write "in_blue(x)", the fact that blue is chosen is part of the identifier for the function. You are saying "blue" can be passed as an argument to the function but that is different. I would suspect lisp can do this pretty easily, and probably most interpreted languages can do something like this but perhaps using non-portable code specific to a given interpreter.[[User:Spitzak|Spitzak]] ([[User talk:Spitzak|talk]]) 21:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
