Split-complex number: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Algebraic properties: not Reduced ring
Tag: Reverted
Undid revision 1119919745 by Rgdboer (talk) can you explain this change a bit more? looking at the definition of "reduced ring", the split-complex numbers clearly qualify. e.g. 1 + j is nilpotent because (1 + j)² = 0
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 126:
 
The image of {{mvar|x}} in the quotient is the "imaginary" unit {{mvar|j}}. With this description, it is clear that the split-complex numbers form a [[commutative algebra (structure)|commutative algebra]] over the real numbers. The algebra is ''not'' a [[field (mathematics)|field]] since the null elements are not invertible. All of the nonzero null elements are [[zero divisor]]s.
 
The split-complex numbers are [[algebra isomorphism|isomorphic as an algebra]] to the [[direct product]] of {{math|'''R'''}} by itself. It is thus a [[reduced ring|reduced]] [[Artinian ring]].
 
Since addition and multiplication are continuous operations with respect to the usual topology of the plane, the split-complex numbers form a [[topological ring]].