Revision as of 17:05, 17 November 2020 edit 117.230.145.132 (talk) →The reference of the 1979 NASA report "Quaternions proposed standard conventions" is not locatable: new section Tag: Reverted ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:35, 6 November 2022 edit undo Materialscientist (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Rollbackers, Administrators 2,037,234 edits m Reverted edits by 117.230.145.132 (talk) to last version by Drankinatty Tag: Rollback Next edit →
Line 75: It says in the introduction Euler used quaternions for [[Magic squares]]. This seems unlikely as the math is completely unrelated. Can somebody figure out if there is some way this is true and maybe fix the link? ~~== The reference of the 1979 NASA report "Quaternions proposed standard conventions" is not locatable ==~~ Google scholar has only a citation; no pdf. NASA STI server also doesn't show this report.[[Special:Contributions/117.230.145.132\|117.230.145.132]] ([[User talk:117.230.145.132\|talk]]) 17:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Conversion between quaternions and Euler angles: Difference between revisions