Content deleted Content added
→Revert: Reply |
→Revert: Reply |
||
Line 25:
:::What has been explained? Where? The only things you said you objected to was the mention of redirects in the lead sentence, which I removed, and the added sentence about G13, which I removed. Oh, and that it is "substantially longer", even though it's shorter. In other words, ''tell me what is lacking consensus'', and we can talk about it. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 05:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
::::I object to you rewriting this with a misleading edit summary that said you did a copyedit. The changes are too numerous to detail. Rewriting this lacks consensus. "Although copy editors are generally expected to make simple revisions ... , they do not have a license to rewrite a text line by line". Just do a diff listing to see how much you changed. [[User:MB|<b style="color:#034503">MB</b>]] 05:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
:::::[[Copy editing]] is generally understood as rewriting text to improve its readability without substantially changing its meaning. That is what I did. I'm sorry if you found the edit summary misleading, but what am I supposed to do about that now, three days and four reverts later? I will try to rephrase my question again: what changes would I have to make, for you to be happy with the edit you have chosen to revert? – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 06:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
== Some cleanup ==
| |||