Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Vox Rationis (talk | contribs) delete |
delete (or transwiki if a host can be found) |
||
Line 27:
*'''Keep''' per [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]. --[[User:Voidxor|Voidxor]] 04:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Not worthy or notable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not for minute technical details of minute aspects of the huge realm of internet design, it is an encylopedia... This belongs in a technical manual, no doubt, but that is not what wikipedia is.--[[User:Vox Rationis|Vox Rationis]] 00:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. [[WP:NOT#IINFO]] of the how-to guide variety. Absolutely fails to be an [[WP:ENC]]yclopedia article. The [[WP:ATT]]ributability, or not, of the content is irrelevant. The best referencing in the world wouldn't make this suitable for Wikipedia. There ought to be some WMF/Wikia project this can be transwikied to, where it would be right at home, but this isn't it. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 19:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
|