Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statement syntax (MySQL): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Megan1967 (talk | contribs)
Vote
Line 3:
*'''Keep''' because SQL syntax is extremely widely used, including in Vfd discussins. But don't let it get too detailed, should just be general explanation illustrative examples. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 13:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*I believe it's useful, but as a primary text it belongs in '''wikisource'''. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 15:11, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
**A manual for a piece of software is best off in [[Wikibooks]]. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 11:57, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC)
*'''Transwiki'''. [[User:Megan1967|Megan1967]] 08:29, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
* Wikipedia is not a manual ... but [[Wikibooks]] ''is'' a manual (or, rather, a collection of manuals). There's probably a need for a [[Wikibooks:Using MySQL]] book on the [[Wikibooks:Using open source software]] section of the [[Wikibooks:IT bookshelf]], given that the MySQL manual isn't GFDL. However, this isn't a particularly good starting point. This article isn't even as good as the [[Wikibooks:Programming:SQL]] book that ''already exists'' on WikiBooks. No need to Transwiki as WikiBooks already has better. '''Delete'''. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 11:57, 2005 Mar 17 (UTC)