Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Race and intelligence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Futurebird (talk | contribs) →Compromise: stalled? |
Futurebird (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 120:
#[[Race and intelligence (interpretations)]] belongs in the [[Race and intelligence (Controversies)]] section, not in the section for research. This section explains the interpretations that various scholars have of the gap. All of the explanations (both liberal and conservative) are slightly political and controversial in nature. There is no agreement about how gaps ought to be understood among academics. The work in this section isn't about experiments, but rather it about comparing data from experiments that others have done and then drawing conclusions about what should or should not be done.[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 03:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
====Compromise====
* I'm willing to compromise given the points raised by JK and have [[Race and intelligence (interpretations)]] be a sub-section of research. But, [[Race and intelligence research]] still needs it's own subarticle.[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 13:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
* The history section should be integrated as it pretty much is now including research and things that are now considered "scientific racism" we need to do this because the line is blurry and debated.
* The research sub-article should not contian it's own history section. It should focus on modern work. [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 15:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
| |||