Content deleted Content added
→Protected roundabouts: That's a blog! It's not even permitted in external links, let alone as a reference Tag: references removed |
oops, deleted some image code |
||
Line 73:
As cyclists will conflict with motorists at the exit arms of the motorised roundabout, priority must be established. In the Netherlands, cyclists will normally be given priority to promote cycling over driving.<ref name=":0"/>{{Rp|page=148}} This is the design that has often been transposed internationally, labelled the 'Dutch roundabout', e.g. in [[Cambridge]], UK.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-09-26|title=Cambridge's Dutch-style roundabout: Why all the fuss?|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-53947440|access-date=2022-01-17}}</ref>
<gallery widths="240" heights="240">
File:Protected roundabout 3D.png|alt=Diagram of a single-lane roundabout with a circulatory segregated cycle roundabout. Cyclists and pedestrians have priority over vehicles joining and leaving the roundabout.|3D view of a protected roundabout, as commonly used in the Netherlands
File:Alternative dutch roundabout.png|alt=A single lane roundabout with a bidirectional circulatory cycle track and set back cycle crossings. Cyclists must give way to vehicles leaving and joining the roundabout. |Alternative Dutch roundabout design, with bidirectional tracks and motorist priority
| |||