Content deleted Content added
→Requested move 20 November 2022: oppose with alternative suggestion(s) |
|||
Line 444:
*:{{re|Dicklyon}} See the previous discussion above. Basically every discussion on this page is about this issue. You can also read the doc of the template. In short, the template was set-up by author to a include specific Unix-spec commands but bears a general name. Renaming should fix this confusion. <span style="font-weight: bold" >[[User:Alexander_Davronov|<span style="color:#a8a8a8;">AXO</span><span style="color:#000">NOV</span>]] [[User talk:Alexander_Davronov|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Alexander_Davronov|⚑]]</span> 11:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
*::So it's already limited to the Single Unix Specification? And that's the only system entitled to use the Unix trademark? I don't see why we'd need to change the template title then. But I'll withdraw my "oppose" if I see more reasoned support. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 01:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' I agree in part with the 'solution looking for a problem', but have another concern. These commands are typically not limited to the "Single UNIX Specification" or even UNIX as such, even though that is a defining parameter for inclusion. Though less informative on surface, might be useful to consider [[:Template:Universal SUS Commands]] or [[:Template:Universal SUS Programs]]; these emphasize the universality of the command set, which is on key feature of the set. --User:Ceyockey (<small>''[[User talk:Ceyockey|talk to me]]''</small>) 00:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
|