Content deleted Content added
→Geometry: 1848 ref via Biodiversity Heritage |
math formatting (converted formulas to <math>, changed to real number symbols) |
||
Line 4:
{{Inline|date=July 2022}}
In [[algebra]], a '''split complex number''' (or '''hyperbolic number''', also '''perplex number''', '''double number''') has two [[real number]] components {{mvar|x}} and {{mvar|y}}, and is written
The collection {{mvar|D}} of all split complex numbers
A similar algebra based on {{
<math display="block">\begin{align}
D &\to \mathbb{R}^2 \\
x + yj &\mapsto (x - y, x + y)
\end{align}</math>
relates proportional quadratic forms, but the mapping is {{em|not}} an [[isometry]] since the multiplicative identity {{math|(1, 1)}} of {{
Split-complex numbers have many other names; see ''{{section link||Synonyms}}'' below. See the article ''[[Motor variable]]'' for functions of a split-complex number.
Line 48:
These three properties imply that the split-complex conjugate is an [[automorphism]] of [[order (group theory)|order]] 2.
The squared '''modulus''' of a split-complex number
<math display="block">\lVert z \rVert^2 = z z^* = z^* z = x^2 - y^2 ~.</math>
Line 58:
The associated [[bilinear form]] is given by
<math display="block">\langle z, w \rangle = \operatorname\mathcal{R_e}\left(zw^*\right) = \operatorname\mathcal{R_e} \left(z^* w\right) = xu - yv ~,</math>
where
<math display="block"> \lVert z \rVert^2 = \langle z, z \rangle ~.</math>
Since it is not positive-definite, this bilinear form is not an [[inner product]]; nevertheless the bilinear form is frequently referred to as an ''indefinite inner product''. A similar abuse of language refers to the modulus as a norm.
A split-complex number is invertible [[if and only if]] its modulus is nonzero {{nowrap|(<math>\lVert z \rVert \ne 0</math>),}} thus numbers of the form {{math|''x'' ± ''j
<math display="block">z^{-1} = \frac{z^*}{ {\lVert z \rVert}^2} ~.</math>
Split-complex numbers which are not invertible are called [[null vector]]s. These are all of the form {{math|(''a'' ± ''j
===The diagonal basis===
There are two nontrivial [[idempotent element (ring theory)|idempotent element]]s given by
<math display="block">\lVert e \rVert = \lVert e^* \rVert = e^* e = 0 ~.</math>
Line 75:
<math display="block"> z = x + jy = (x - y)e + (x + y)e^* ~.</math>
If we denote the number
<math display="block">\left( a_1, b_1 \right) \left( a_2, b_2 \right) = \left( a_1 a_2, b_1 b_2 \right) ~.</math>
In this basis, it becomes clear that the split-complex numbers are [[ring isomorphism|ring-isomorphic]] to the direct sum {{
The split-complex conjugate in the diagonal basis is given by
Line 85:
<math display="block">\lVert (a, b) \rVert = ab.</math>
Though lying in the same isomorphism class in the [[category of rings]], the split-complex plane and the direct sum of two real lines differ in their layout in the [[Cartesian plane]]. The isomorphism, as a planar mapping, consists of a counter-clockwise rotation by 45° and a [[dilation (metric space)|dilation]] by {{sqrt|2}}. The dilation in particular has sometimes caused confusion in connection with areas of a [[hyperbolic sector]]. Indeed, [[hyperbolic angle]] corresponds to [[area]] of a sector in the {{
==Geometry==
<!-- This section is linked from [[Lorentz transformation]] -->
[[Image:Drini-conjugatehyperbolas.svg|thumb|
{{ {{ {{ A two-dimensional real [[vector space]] with the Minkowski inner product is called {{
The set of points
<math display="block">\left\{ z : \lVert z \rVert^2 = a^2 \right\}</math>
is a [[hyperbola]] for every nonzero {{mvar|a}} in {{
<math display="block">\left\{ z : \lVert z \rVert^2 = -a^2 \right\}</math>
with an upper and lower branch passing through {{math|(0, ''a'')}} and {{math|(0, −''a'')}}. The hyperbola and conjugate hyperbola are separated by two diagonal [[asymptote]]s which form the set of null elements:
<math display="block">\left\{ z : \lVert z \rVert = 0 \right\}.</math>
These two lines (sometimes called the '''null cone''') are [[perpendicular]] in {{
Split-complex numbers {{mvar|z}} and {{mvar|w}} are said to be [[hyperbolic-orthogonal]] if {{math|1=⟨''z'', ''w''⟩ = 0
The analogue of [[Euler's formula]] for the split-complex numbers is
Line 115 ⟶ 118:
The exponential map
<math display="block">\exp\colon (\
sending {{mvar|θ}} to rotation by {{math|exp(''jθ'')}} is a [[group isomorphism]] since the usual exponential formula applies:
<math display="block">e^{j(\theta + \phi)} = e^{j\theta}e^{j\phi}.</math>
Line 122 ⟶ 125:
==Algebraic properties==
In [[abstract algebra]] terms, the split-complex numbers can be described as the [[quotient ring|quotient]] of the [[polynomial ring]] {{
<math display="block">\R[x]/(x^2-1 ).</math>
The image of {{mvar|x}} in the quotient is the "imaginary" unit {{mvar|j}}. With this description, it is clear that the split-complex numbers form a [[commutative algebra (structure)|commutative algebra]] over the real numbers. The algebra is ''not'' a [[field (mathematics)|field]] since the null elements are not invertible. All of the nonzero null elements are [[zero divisor]]s.
Line 132 ⟶ 135:
:<math>\lVert zw \rVert = \lVert z \rVert \lVert w \rVert ~</math> for any numbers {{mvar|z}} and {{mvar|w}}.
From the definition it is apparent that the ring of split-complex numbers is isomorphic to the [[group ring]] {{
==Matrix representations==
Line 144 ⟶ 147:
For any real number {{mvar|a}}, a hyperbolic rotation by a [[hyperbolic angle]] {{mvar|a}} corresponds to multiplication by the matrix
<math display="block">\begin{pmatrix}
\cosh a & \sinh a \\ \sinh a & \cosh a \end{pmatrix}.</math> [[File:Commutative diagram split-complex number 2.svg|right|200px|thumb|This [[commutative diagram]] relates the action of the hyperbolic versor on {{mvar|D}} to squeeze mapping {{mvar|σ}} applied to {{
The diagonal basis for the split-complex number plane can be invoked by using an ordered pair {{math|(''x'', ''y'')}} for <math>z = x + jy</math> and making the mapping
Line 152 ⟶ 158:
Now the quadratic form is <math>uv = (x + y)(x - y) = x^2 - y^2 ~.</math> Furthermore,
<math display="block">(\cosh a, \sinh a) \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{pmatrix} = \left(e^a, e^{-a}\right)</math> so the two [[one-parameter group|parametrized]] hyperbolas are brought into correspondence with {{mvar|S}}.
Line 177 ⟶ 186:
is the line of events simultaneous with the origin in the frame of reference with rapidity ''a''.
Two events {{mvar|z}} and {{mvar|w}} are [[hyperbolic-orthogonal]] when
In 1933 [[Max Zorn]] was using the [[split-octonion]]s and noted the [[composition algebra]] property. He realized that the [[Cayley–Dickson construction]], used to generate division algebras, could be modified (with a factor gamma, {{mvar|γ}}) to construct other composition algebras including the split-octonions. His innovation was perpetuated by [[Adrian Albert]], Richard D. Schafer, and others.<ref>Robert B. Brown (1967)[http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pjm/1102992693 On Generalized Cayley-Dickson Algebras], [[Pacific Journal of Mathematics]] 20(3):415–22, link from [[Project Euclid]].</ref> The gamma factor, with {{math|'''R'''}} as base field, builds split-complex numbers as a composition algebra. Reviewing Albert for [[Mathematical Reviews]], N. H. McCoy wrote that there was an "introduction of some new algebras of order 2<sup>e</sup> over ''F'' generalizing Cayley–Dickson algebras."<ref>N.H. McCoy (1942) Review of "Quadratic forms permitting composition" by A.A. Albert, [[Mathematical Reviews]] #0006140</ref> Taking {{math|1=''F'' = '''R'''}} and {{math|1=''e'' = 1 }} corresponds to the algebra of this article.
|