Revision as of 08:19, 19 December 2022 edit 2a01:cb0c:cd:d800:d1b7:91bb:c98d:c0fc (talk) →Implementations?: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:22, 19 December 2022 edit undo 2a01:cb0c:cd:d800:d1b7:91bb:c98d:c0fc (talk) →Some topics: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 95: My contention is not that your point is wrong, but that it is no point at all. Therefore, it is natural that I say things which do not revolve around it.--[[Special:Contributions/155.210.234.246\|155.210.234.246]] ([[User talk:155.210.234.246\|talk]]) 04:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC) : Yes, Gottwald's two-part survey paper is good. I found it myself while browsing his list of publications. I'll add it to the further reading section, now that we have that. [[User:Tijfo098\|Tijfo098]] ([[User talk:Tijfo098\|talk]]) 16:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC) :''' The first one concerns fuzzy sets, saying that axiomatic fuzzy set theories exist which do not rely on non-fuzzy set theories (as has been shown at your request.)''' Oh my, how clever! A side by side comparison of the axiom lists quickly reveals how the rabbit is magicked out of the hat - it will even show you how the rabbit got there in the first place. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC\|2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC]] ([[User talk:2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC\|talk]]) 08:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC) == Fuzzy sets and Multi sets ==

Talk:Fuzzy set: Difference between revisions