Revision as of 08:25, 19 December 2022 edit 2a01:cb0c:cd:d800:d1b7:91bb:c98d:c0fc (talk) →Fuzzy Mathematics: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:28, 19 December 2022 edit undo 2a01:cb0c:cd:d800:d1b7:91bb:c98d:c0fc (talk) →Implications: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 145: What are the implications of fuzzy sets? Is there any practical application of this subject? [[Special:Contributions/78.86.61.94\|78.86.61.94]] ([[User talk:78.86.61.94\|talk]]) 23:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC) :well, there have been lots in engineering, almost invariably piece-wise linear controllers. apparently engineers (1) cannot get their heads around non-linear dynamics (an unfortunate consequence of the fact that they are taught that calculus is something that happens "in the frequency ___domain") and (2) they must ''really'' like the term ''fuzzy'', which makes to sound like cutting edge maths, as opposed to gluing PIDSs together in messy ways. On a less frivolous note, no, the subject does not afford any advantage or insight beyond poor mathematicians playing around endlessly with definitions. Especially egregious are claims that quantum mechanics makes more sense from a fuzzy point of view --- that amounts to pointing students in a direction diametrically opposed to the truth. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC\|2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC]] ([[User talk:2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D1B7:91BB:C98D:C0FC\|talk]]) 08:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC) == Plea ==

Talk:Fuzzy set: Difference between revisions