Code page 932 (Microsoft Windows): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I think this is more accurate and flows better.
Line 20:
IBM offer the same extended double-byte codes in their '''[[code page]] 943''' ('''IBM-943''' or '''CP943'''),<ref name="ibm932v943">{{cite web | url=https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/ssw_aix_71/com.ibm.aix.nlsgdrf/ibm-943_ibm-932.htm | title=IBM-943 and IBM-932 | publisher=IBM | work=IBM Knowledge Center}}</ref> which is a combination of the single-byte [[Code page 897]] and the double-byte '''Code page 941'''.<ref name="ibm943">{{cite web | url=http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/ccsid/ccsid943.html | title=Coded character set identifiers - CCSID 943 | publisher=IBM | work=IBM Globalization | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315110642/http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/ccsid/ccsid943.html | archive-date=2016-03-15}}</ref>
 
Windows-31J is the most used non-[[UTF-8]]/Unicode Japanese encoding on the web. ActuallyHowever, many people declare the {{nowrap|[[Shift JIS]]}} is the much more declared encoding, butwhen bythey W3C/WHATWGactually HTMLmean standards, theWindows-31J. encodingsThis arehas declaredlead the same,WHATWG and while the latter name is used in the standards it'sHTML definedstandard to decodetreat thea former.declaration Seeof {{nowrap|[[Shift JIS]]}} page foras statisticsWindows-31J.<!-- Per W3C / WHATWG standards, the labels Shift_JIS and Windows-31J are treated the same; the W3C/WHATWG spec uses the Shift JIS name, but its definition actually matches Windows-31J (not JIS X 0208 Appendix 1). -->
 
==Terminology==