Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. Add: date, isbn, pmid, doi, authors 1-1. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox2 | #UCB_webform_linked 1144/2778 |
Davide King (talk | contribs) m ce |
||
Line 1:
{{short description|Relationship between intelligent design and science}}
{{Intelligent Design}}
The relationship between '''intelligent design and science''' has been a contentious one. [[Intelligent design]] (ID) is presented by its proponents as science and claims to offer an alternative to [[evolution]]. The [[Discovery Institute]], a politically conservative [[think tank]] and the leading proponent of intelligent design, launched a campaign entitled "Teach the Controversy", which claims that a controversy exists within the scientific community over evolution. The scientific community
=="Teach the Controversy"==
Line 18:
|title=NABT's Statement on Teaching Evolution
|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060927160040/http://www.nabt.org/sub/position_statements/evolution.asp
|archivedate=2006-09-27}}</ref><ref>
{{cite web
|url = http://www.interacademies.net/Object.File/Master/6/150/Evolution%20statement.pdf
|