Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 66: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) m Fix font tag lint errors |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Removed invalid italics causing Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 87:
=== Motion regarding Iantresman ===
:
*'''Enacted''' -- [[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]] ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]) 20:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Line 601:
Remedy 13 of the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience|Pseudoscience]] Case is modified to read "Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all articles relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning."<p>Existing discretionary sanction remedies that this motion will deprecate may be stricken through and marked as redundant in the usual manner. Enforcement should now be sought under ''Pseudoscience'', rather than under previous decisions concerning sub-topics of pseudoscience, but previous or existing sanctions or enforcement actions are not affected by this motion.
:
;Support
| |||