Content deleted Content added
Removing my earlier comment: The article does mention these things |
→Infobox: new section |
||
Line 131:
The Pascal calling convention was used because it saves on code size. That doesn't mean that the Pascal language was used. This fallacious claim should have a citation. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.159.105.93|50.159.105.93]] ([[User talk:50.159.105.93|talk]]) 18:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Infobox ==
I've added an infobox. I realize there are 2 things that may seem odd about it, so I thought I would explain:
# I've used a screenshot of ReactOS, as a screenshot of Windows would not be acceptable on Wikimedia Commons. ReactOS, the 3 Windows applications, and the novel Frankenstein can all be licensed under the GPL without issue.
# I saw a place in the software infobox for OS. Currently, I've placed Windows and OS/2 there as these were the only operating systems that were publicly claiming Windows compatibility. ReactOS, Wine, etc. strive for it, but do not have Microsoft's stamp of approval. OS/2 is debatable as it implemented the Windows API up to a certain version. ReactOS could possibly go there, if they explicitly claim to support the Windows API but I think they state something slightly different.
[[User:Rjjiii|Rjjiii]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 05:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
| |||