Content deleted Content added
Dissoxciate (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1127033543 by 142.127.214.79 (talk) unexplained removal Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 140:
===Dependency theory===
Dependency theorists opposed that liberal development models, including the attempt to incorporate women into the existing global capitalism, was, in fact, nothing more than the "development of [[underdevelopment]]."<ref>{{cite book|last=Frank|first=Andre Gunder|title=Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America : historical studies of Chile and Brazil|url=https://archive.org/details/capitalismunderd00fran|url-access=registration|year=1969|publisher=Monthly Review P.|___location=New York|isbn=978-0853450931|edition= Rev. and enl.}}</ref> This view led them to propose that [[delinking]] from the structural oppression of [[global capitalism]] is the only way to achieve balanced human development.
In the 1980s, there also emerged "a sustained questioning by [[post-structuralist]] critics of the development paradigm as a narrative of progress and as an achievable enterprise."<ref>{{cite book |last=Ghosh |first=Jayati |title=The Women, Gender and Development Reader |publisher=Zed Books |year=2011 |isbn=9781780321387 |editor-last=Visvanathan |editor-first=Nalini |edition=2nd |___location=London |page=29 |chapter=Financial crises and the impact on woman: a historical note |editor-last2=Duggan |editor-first2=Lynn |editor-last3=Wiegersma |editor-first3=Nan |editor-last4=Nisonoff |editor-first4=Laurie}}</ref>
| |||