Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) subst to allow removal of the heading syntax |
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) update to remove section headers |
||
Line 31:
A rough consensus of administrators at AE or editors at AN may specify a period of up to one year during which no appeals (other than an appeal to ARCA) may be submitted.
An administrator may only modify or revoke a contentious topic restriction if a formal appeal is successful or if one of the following exceptions applies:
* The administrator who originally imposed the contentious topic restriction (the "enforcing administrator") affirmatively consents to the change,{{efn|1=The administrator may indicate consent at any time before, during, or after imposition of the restriction.}} or is no longer an administrator;{{efn|This criterion does not apply if the original action was imposed as a result of rough consensus at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, as there would be no single enforcing administrator.}} or
Line 45:
Any administrator who revokes or changes a contentious topic restriction out of process (i.e. without the above conditions being met) may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.
Uninvolved administrators at the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] ("AE") and uninvolved editors at the [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]] ("AN") should revoke or modify a contentious topic restriction on appeal if:
# the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
Line 52:
# the action is no longer reasonably necessary to prevent damage or disruption.
Arbitrators hearing an appeal at a [[WP:ARCA|request for amendment]] ("ARCA") will generally overturn a contentious topic restriction only if:
# the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
| |||