Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) add |
Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) add |
||
Line 21:
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics|procedures]] relating to modifications of contentious topic restrictions state the following:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
{{ivmbox|1=All contentious topic restrictions (and [[#Warnings|logged warnings]]) may be appealed. Only the restricted editor may appeal an editor restriction. Any editor may appeal a page restriction.
The appeal process has three possible stages. An editor appealing a restriction may:
Line 56:
# the action was inconsistent with the contentious topics procedure or applicable policy (i.e. the action was out of process),
# the action represents an unreasonable exercise of administrative enforcement discretion, or
# compelling circumstances warrant the full Committee's action.}}
{{notelist}}
The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures|procedures]] relating to modifications and appeals state:<!-- Last updated 18 Jan 2023 -->
{{ivmbox|1=
;Appeals by sanctioned editors
Line 86 ⟶ 87:
# <li value="2"> While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
# These provisions apply only to contentious topic restrictions placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorized by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special functionary blocks of whatever nature.
# All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally discussed at another venue.}}
{{cob}}
| |||