Revision as of 05:37, 15 November 2022 edit Kandekere (talk \| contribs) 1 edit No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:57, 21 January 2023 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,871,942 edits Add: url, s2cid, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by Corvus florensis \| #UCB_webform 383/1800 Next edit →
Line 7: ==Constructing glyphs== Glyph construction can be a complex process when there are many dimensions to be represented in the visualization. Maguire et al proposed a taxonomy based approach to glyph-design that uses a tree to guide the visual encodings used to representation various data items.<ref>{{Cite journal \|~~last~~last1=Maguire \|~~first~~first1=E. \|last2=Rocca-Serra\|first2=P. \|last3=Sansone \|first3=S. A. \|last4=Davies \|first4=J. \|last5=Chen \|first5=M. \|date=2012-12-01 \|title=Taxonomy-Based Glyph Design #8212;with a Case Study on Visualizing Workflows of Biological Experiments\|journal=IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics\|volume=18\|issue=12\|pages=2603–2612\|doi=10.1109/TVCG.2012.271\|pmid=26357169\|s2cid=9350966 \|issn=1077-2626\|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:611a7988-2ba9-4f01-8df0-f6688a01bdc8 }}</ref> Duffy et al created perhaps one of the most complex glyph representations with their representation of sperm movement.{{Citation needed\|reason=Citation for the original work containing the glyphs as well as a source that makes the claim that it is the most complex glyph representation.\|date=February 2019}}

Glyph (data visualization): Difference between revisions