Revision as of 05:43, 6 January 2023 edit Tbhotch (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 327,872 edits already closed ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:32, 24 January 2023 edit undo David10244 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,985 edits →Slower by a negative amount?: new section Tag: New topic Next edit →
Line 162: :::Yet another possibility is that it will not be possible to get all the details worked out by 2035, so leap seconds will continue until they are. [[User:John Sauter\|John Sauter]] ([[User talk:John Sauter\|talk]]) 15:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC) ::::It seems that ''Nature'' [https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03783-5 is not convinced] that the decision is final either. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman\|𝕁𝕄𝔽]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman\|talk]]) 11:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC) == Slower by a negative amount? == In the History section, shortly after "rubber second": The phrase "slower than the rate of atomic time by −150 parts per 10 (raised to the tenth)" is confusing. Is that dash a "minus sign/negative sign"? If so: Doesn't ''slower by a negative amount'' mean ''faster''? If "slower" is kept, I suggest removing the negative signs from the various phrases in this section. [[User:David10244\|David10244]] ([[User talk:David10244\|talk]]) 05:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Leap second: Difference between revisions