Content deleted Content added
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) →Allow nowiki option to have three states: absolutely fantastic! |
|||
Line 93:
::Sounds good to me! Definitely think of the maintainability of the code ahead of the minor convenience of only having one option to consider. Personally; I think <code>combined</code> is better. Thank you for your consideration 😊 <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">[[User:Fred Gandt|Fred Gandt]] · [[User talk:Fred Gandt|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Fred Gandt|contribs]]</code> 09:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Fred Gandt}} I've managed to get some initial work done on this (currently got the main functions <code>preprocess_equals(_many)</code> and <code>preprocess_equals_preprocess(_many)</code> running under the new system idea in the sandbox) - Does the format I've given seen fine in your testcases? I don't want to start working on the more complicated to convert functions unless it's all working fine. You can test these by changing <code>require('Module:UnitTests')</code> to <code>require('Module:UnitTests/sandbox')</code> and specifying <code>combined</code> instead of <code>nowiki</code>. [[User:Aidan9382|Aidan9382]] <sub>([[User talk:Aidan9382|talk]])</sub> 14:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
::::Really; that looks great! Very neat table organisation. I hope all your effort is appreciated by more than just me, but rest assured I am impressed. Seeing the raw markup is great for technical analysis, but seeing the result is great for rapid detection of issues. Having them side by side (well over and under but same thing) like that is a quality of life improvement. Thank you 😊 <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">[[User:Fred Gandt|Fred Gandt]] · [[User talk:Fred Gandt|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Fred Gandt|contribs]]</code> 16:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
== Present failed tests together at the top ==
| |||