Content deleted Content added
→Crystal plasticity FEM: new section |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 131:
::Five years later, and frankly, this article is still terrible. Guido's remark that one can only recognize the method at all from this article with great difficulty is spot-on. There are plenty of very intelligent people discussing the most banal of things on this discussion page - the "underlooked role" of one person or another in its history, etc. - can't we improve this article so that it is worth something? The article is terrible, folks, absolutely terrible. If making little changes is not going to improve the situation, then please, someone be bold and rewrite the whole thing. -[[Special:Contributions/24.13.162.248|24.13.162.248]] ([[User talk:24.13.162.248|talk]]) 00:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
:::What are you waiting for? Go ahead, make improvements if you have the ability (but please spare us with your opinion on how incapable all other editors are)! [[User:Tomeasy|<span style="color:#0000f1;font-family:Papyrus;cursor:help">'''''T<
== Not much use to a non-mathematician ==
| |||