Revision as of 23:03, 8 March 2007 view source Morven (talk \| contribs) 18,655 edits →Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (1/0/1/0) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:07, 8 March 2007 view source Morven (talk \| contribs) 18,655 edits →Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (2/2/0/0): Decline. Next edit →
Line 217: :Talkpage note left for BabyDweezil to please remove threaded discussion and reduce overall statement length promptly. [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] 17:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC) ==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (2/23/0/0) ==== * Accept to review conduct of all editors involved. [[User:Kirill Lokshin\|Kirill Lokshin]] 18:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC) * '''Decline.''' The available evidence would suggest that the community has only acted after a saint-like period of forebearance. [[User:UninvitedCompany\|The Uninvited]] Co., [[User_talk:UninvitedCompany\|Inc.]] 22:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC) * Decline, both on principle and on the specifics of the case. --[[User:Jpgordon\|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon\|∇∆∇∆]]</small></sup> 00:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC) * Accept to consider length of block and perhaps conflict of interest. [[User:Fred Bauder\|Fred Bauder]] 05:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC) * '''Decline''' for similar reasons to UC. [[User:Morven\|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven\|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven\|C]]) 23:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC) ----

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions