Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed Language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:04, 9 February 2022

Latest revision as of 13:15, 6 February 2023

Line 18:

*'''Comment''' Would definitely like to see it stubbed if it appears to be a real concept; this looks to me like ''another'' school assignment. [[User:JeremyMcCracken|JeremyMcCracken]] ([[user talk:JeremyMcCracken|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/JeremyMcCracken|contribs]]) 02:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

:I am not sure that this one is a school project. The article appears to be something of a plug for the work and the views of something called the "Distributed Language Group" [http://www.psy.herts.ac.uk/dlg/index.html]. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 02:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - per Nsk92. <i><fontspan facestyle="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Asenine|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#4682b4;">a</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#5c9cc7;">s</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#72b5d9;">e</FONTspan><FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#87ceeb;">nine</FONTspan>]] ^{[[User_talk:Asenine|<FONTspan COLORstyle="color:#72b5d9;">say what?</FONTspan>]]}</fontspan></i> 04:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' RHaworth - I don't think that calling distributed language "a novel approach" makes the article OR. It seems likely that many of the references are OR, but if that's not acceptable then I need to be pointed to some Wiki policies that I've failed to grok. That said, I'm not much of a linguist, either, and I find Nsk92's arguments about POV and incomprehensibility compelling. I agree with the "delete if no major fix is forthcoming" position. [[User:Stationary|Stationary]] ([[User talk:Stationary|talk]]) 15:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)