Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granular Search engine optimization: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
Line 13:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—[[User:Top Jim|Top Jim]] ([[User talk:Top Jim|talk]]) 07:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment''' I've removed [[WP:SPAM]] from the nomination, as the article no longer mentions or links to that company. [[User:Top Jim|Top Jim]] ([[User talk:Top Jim|talk]]) 07:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Strong delete'''. This term is not widely used in the [[search engine optimization]] industry, as evident by the [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4TSNA_enUS385US385&q=%22Granular+Search+engine+optimization%22 4 search results] (including Wikipedia and the external link spam that the nom has removed). Now, normally GHITs don't matter, but when the subject of your article claims to be a term used in ''internet'' marketing, four results is just unacceptable. It's a marketing [[WP:NEO|buzzword]] and a covert [[WP:AD|advertisement]] for a [[WP:N|non-notable]] SEO company.--[[User:Hongkongresident|hkr]] [[User talk:Hongkongresident|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#800517;">'''Laozi'''</fontspan> <fontspan colorstyle="color:#F88017;">''speak''</fontspan>]] 12:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
:'''Strong delete''' for the reasons explained by the Hong Kong Resident. --[[User:Orangemike|<span style="color:darkorange;">Orange Mike</span>]] &#x007C; [[User talk:Orangemike|<span style="color:orange;">Talk</span>]] 14:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nomination, and Hongkongresident; coatrack spam. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] - [[User talk:Ihcoyc|killing the human spirit since 2003!]] 14:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)