Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''keep'''. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> [[User:Aguyintobooks|<
===[[:Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database]]===
:{{la|Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 18#{{anchorencode:Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Multilingual_Multiscript_Plant_Name_Database Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database}})
Couldn't find significant independent coverage. Article's sources are affiliated. Reads like an advertisement. ''' —''' [[User:Mr. Guye|Mr. Guye]] ([[User talk:Mr. Guye|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Mr. Guye|contribs]])  01:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. <
*'''Oppose''' deletion. It certainly needs re-writing though. There are at least 76 references using this source in other articles, and it is a useful resource for plant names. As the article says, it is linked to, and hence to a degree recommended by, highly reputable online plant databases, such as GRIN, IPNI, etc. I don't have time to re-write it now, but it can be done. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead|talk]]) 08:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Line 17:
*'''Keep''' In many cases this is the most readily available source for translating plant names into multiple languages, and thus sees frequent recognition and use in other large databases and in sources all over the web. --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 16:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <
*'''Keep'''. [http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Frontpage.html Here is] proper entry point to the database if I understand correctly. At the first glance, it looks to me as a useful and important specialized database, and it was quoted multiple times, exactly as Peter coxhead tells above. The page is poorly written and disorganized, however this is not a valid reason for deletion. Yes, it should be fixed. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 15:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
| |||