Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 11:
:({{Find sources AFD|Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity}})
Article was AfDed incorrectly and without explanation by a new user. Taking a look, it's pretty clear that this is [[WP:OR]]. The second sentence of the lead is {{tq|"'Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity' is probably not an official term."}} Certainly fails [[WP:GNG]] and could probably be deleted per [[WP:NEO]], [[WP:NOT]], [[WP:MADEUP]], or a host of others. I see it was PRODded with no explanation a while back, and thus declined, so that may preclude CSD. Given that, and the aforementioned attempted AfD, this seemed like the more appropriate venue. — <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></span> \\ 16:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<
*'''Delete,''' one of those cases where if [[WP:MADEUP]] was a speedy tag, it would be long gone. The only mention I can find of this subject online is in some obscure textbook-looking-thing, and no hits on scholar. [[User:Deadbeef|<span style="color:#090;">Dea</span>]][[User Talk:Deadbeef|<span style="color:#000">db</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Deadbeef|<span style="color:#090">eef</span>]] 21:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
:*{{ping|Deadbeef}} there is a (poosible) speedy tag: [[WP:A11]]. [[User:Stickee|Stickee]] <small>[[User talk:Stickee|(talk)]]</small> 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
| |||