Content deleted Content added
Randy Kryn (talk | contribs) spacing fix in caption |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. Add: page, volume. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Corvus florensis | #UCB_webform 3307/3499 |
||
Line 10:
Detectability of Earth from distant star-based systems may allow for the detectability of humanity and/or analysis of Earth from distant vantage points such as via "[[Technosignature#Atmospheric analysis|atmospheric SETI]]" for the detection of atmospheric compositions explainable only by use of (artificial) technology like [[Nitrogen dioxide#Human-caused sources and exposure|nitrogen dioxide]] [[air pollution]] from e.g. transportation technologies.<ref>{{cite news |title=Pollution on other planets could help us find aliens, Nasa says |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/alien-pollution-planets-nasa-b1801543.html |access-date=6 March 2021 |work=The Independent |date=12 February 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |title=Can Alien Smog Lead Us to Extraterrestrial Civilizations? |url=https://www.wired.com/story/can-alien-smog-lead-us-to-extraterrestrial-civilizations/ |access-date=6 March 2021 |magazine=Wired |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kopparapu |first1=Ravi |last2=Arney |first2=Giada |last3=Haqq-Misra |first3=Jacob |last4=Lustig-Yaeger |first4=Jacob |last5=Villanueva |first5=Geronimo |title=Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution as a Signature of Extraterrestrial Technology |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |date=22 February 2021 |volume=908 |issue=2 |pages=164 |doi=10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |access-date=6 March 2021 |language=en |issn=1538-4357|arxiv=2102.05027|bibcode=2021ApJ...908..164K |s2cid=231855390 }}</ref> The easiest or most likely artificial signals from Earth to be detectable are brief pulses transmitted by [[anti-ballistic missile]] (ABM) early-warning and space-surveillance radars during the [[Cold War]] and later astronomical and military radars.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The benefits and harm of transmitting into space |journal=Space Policy |date=1 February 2013 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=40–48 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265964612001361 |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en |issn=0265-9646|arxiv=1207.5540 |last1=Haqq-Misra |first1=Jacob |last2=Busch |first2=Michael W. |last3=Som |first3=Sanjoy M. |last4=Baum |first4=Seth D. |bibcode=2013SpPol..29...40H |s2cid=7070311 }}</ref><ref name="10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20">{{cite journal |last1=Sullivan |first1=W. T., III |title=Radio leakage and eavesdropping |journal=Strategies for the Search for Life in the Universe |series=Astrophysics and Space Science Library |date=1980 |volume=83 |pages=227–239 |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20 |bibcode=1980ASSL...83..227S |isbn=978-90-277-1226-4 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ASSL...83..227S/abstract |access-date=9 April 2021}}</ref> Unlike the earliest and conventional radio- and television-broadcasting which has been claimed to be undetectable at short distances,<ref>{{cite web |title=How far from Earth could aliens detect our radio signals? |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/how-far-from-earth-could-aliens-detect-our-radio-signals/ |website=BBC Science Focus Magazine |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=This is how far human radio broadcasts have reached into the galaxy |url=https://www.planetary.org/articles/3390 |website=The Planetary Society |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> such signals could be detected from very distant, possibly star-based, receiver stations – any single of which would detect brief episodes of powerful pulses repeating with intervals of one Earth day – and could be used to detect both Earth as well as the presence of a radar-utilizing civilization on it.<ref>{{cite journal |title=XI. - Planets and Life around Other Stars |journal=International Geophysics |date=1 January 2004 |volume=87 |pages=592–608 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0074614204800251 |access-date=5 April 2021 |publisher=Academic Press |doi=10.1016/S0074-6142(04)80025-1 |isbn=9780124467446 |language=en}}</ref><!--https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/radar-transmission-->
Studies have suggested that radio broadcast leakage – with the program material likely not being detectable – may be a technosignature detectable at distances of up to a hundred light years with technology equivalent to the [[Square Kilometer Array]]<ref>{{cite web |title=How Far Into Space Can Radio Telescopes Hear? |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/01/27/how-far-into-space-can-radio-telescopes-hear/ |website=Forbes |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> if the ___location of Earth is known.<ref>{{cite journal |title=A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis |journal=Space Policy |date=1 November 2016 |volume=38 |pages=22–26 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.06.001 |language=en |issn=0265-9646 |quote="While the limits of detection of Earth's radio transmissions are a subject of debate (Sullivan argues ~25 light-years, Atri et al. (2011) and Baum et al. (2011) up to 100 light years), as they largely depend on the size of the receiving antenna"|doi-access=free |last1=De Magalhães |first1=João Pedro |arxiv=1509.03652 |bibcode=2016SpPol..38...22D }}</ref><ref name="JCAP-2007">{{cite
==See also==
|