Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeuwenplaat: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:00, 17 February 2023

Revision as of 13:01, 17 February 2023

Line 28:

* '''Keep all''' - consensus on validity of NGEO has been tested many times and in my opinion it is way too difficult to formulate an alternative notability criteria for this topic area. [[User:JMWt|JMWt]] ([[User talk:JMWt|talk]]) 09:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

*'''Redirect all''' to [[Districts and neighbourhoods of Rotterdam]] or respective districts like [[Hoogvliet]] for the top one. Just because they exist doesn't mean there should be useless one-liners for them. Anyone is welcome to actually write a legitimate article with sources, but a redirect is better than junk like this. These are smaller neighborhoods within official districts and don't have presumed notability either. [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]^{[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]} 14:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

*'''Redirect all''', each neighborhood to its own borough. The neighborhoods are VERY notable, as the keep-sayers rightfully note, and all are RIDICULOUSLY premature [[WP:SPINOFF]]s of their respective boroughs. There's nothing in each but a definition. Their boroughs, which is the next previous spatial unit in the urban hierarchy, are listed only in the infoboxes, not in the sole phrase. The list mentioned above in the opiniondirectly rightabove aboveopinion is for outgoing links and is a very low priority for incoming links. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb|talk]]) 12:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)