Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeuwenplaat: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Meeuwenplaat: spec |
→Meeuwenplaat: Reply |
||
Line 29:
*'''Redirect all''' to [[Districts and neighbourhoods of Rotterdam]] or respective districts like [[Hoogvliet]] for the top one. Just because they exist doesn't mean there should be useless one-liners for them. Anyone is welcome to actually write a legitimate article with sources, but a redirect is better than junk like this. These are smaller neighborhoods within official districts and don't have presumed notability either. [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 14:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
*'''Redirect all''', each neighborhood to its own borough. The neighborhoods are VERY notable, as the keep-sayers rightfully note, and all are RIDICULOUSLY premature [[WP:SPINOFF]]s of their respective boroughs. There's nothing in each but a definition. Their boroughs, which is the previous spatial unit in the Rotterdam spatial hierarchy, are listed only in the infoboxes, not in the sole phrase. The list mentioned in the directly above opinion is for outgoing links and is a very low priority for incoming links. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb|talk]]) 12:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
*:Can you explain why the neighborhoods are "very notable"? I'm asking with genuine interest in both the topic and the WP rules. The main article only mentions submunicipalities (possible synonym of "borough") as administrative divisions (see [[Rotterdam#Composition]]). Perhaps that info is out-of-date because the abolition of boroughs is discussed in [[Government_of_Rotterdam#Boroughs]], but still no mention of the neighborhoods or why they are significant. [[User:Kstern|Kstern]] ([[User talk:Kstern|talk]]) 15:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
| |||