Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeuwenplaat: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:01, 17 February 2023

Revision as of 21:02, 17 February 2023

Line 32:

:::1. Very notable: as explained above the bar for notability of geographical units is low: {{tq|verifiable information beyond simple statistics}}. In addition, the units also meet the high bar of significant coverage many times over. Of course, one could argue that for all recognized geographical units (with the exception of statistically designated areas and loosely defined areas) this is the case and that the bar was set low so we would not waste time with needless discussions about notability.

:::2. As is clear from my position, notability is a required but insufficient condition for keeping an article. For example, these topics are notable but the articles still need to be redirected.

:::3. Rotterdam noDOES longerNOT hashave sub-municipalities. When it did, these covered only some of its area. The status was granted to areas that had been more recently annexed to Rotterdam to provide these a greater degree of autonomy than other regions.

:::4. The boroughs were NOT abolished. The link you provided says so. Boroughs are the primary spatial division of Rotterdam. Neighborhoods secondary. [[User:Gidonb|gidonb]] ([[User talk:Gidonb|talk]]) 17:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': There's a '''LOT''' more of these linked from [[Template:Neighborhoods of Rotterdam]]. So many unsourced articles with a single line stating that they're a neighborhood of Rotterdam. [[User:Hey man im josh|Hey man im josh]] ([[User talk:Hey man im josh|talk]]) 19:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)