Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
Undid revision 1140819830 by 128.187.116.19 (talk) - that claim would need a source, as it disagrees with the paragraph below Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 61:
''// If ''w'' is not on stack, then (''v'', ''w'') is an edge pointing to an SCC already found and must be ignored
''// Note: The next line may look odd - but is correct.''
''// It says w.index not w.lowlink; that is deliberate and from the original paper
''v''.lowlink := min(''v''.lowlink, ''w''.index)
| |||