Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Http file server: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:56, 29 March 2022

Latest revision as of 02:33, 1 March 2023

Line 4:

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Delete'''. [[User:Proto|<span style="text-decoration:none"><span style="text-underline:none"><fontspan colorstyle="color:#007700;">Proto</fontspan></span></span>]]<fontspan colorstyle="color:#555555;"><b>||</b></fontspan><small>[[User_talk:Proto|<span style="text-decoration:none"><span style="text-underline:none"><fontspan colorstyle="color:#007700;">type</fontspan></span></span>]]</small> 14:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

===[[Http file server]]===

Fails to establish notability per [[WP:SOFTWARE]]. Had tagged this <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki>, but [[User:Rawbanana]] who has only edited this article, removed it. Seems to be vanity/advertisement [[User:NTK|NTK]] 18:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Line 18:

:You may remove <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tags from articles you create, but if you do so you should put something on the talk page justifying why you think it should be included, similar to what you wrote above. Please read over the guidelines at [[WP:SOFTWARE]], and also [[WP:NOR]]. In short as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia should not be used to promote "relatively unknown" products, persons, or ideas. It should be used to document things that are already notable in their own right. [[User:NTK|NTK]] 20:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' looking at the article a stable full-featured version was only released last month, which I guess explains why there is no evidence of market share, innovation, iomportance, influence, non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources etc. Which means we can't verify the neutrality of the article. [[WP:SOFTWARE]] appears to apply. [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">Guy</span> you know?]] 21:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Unknown anything is not notable. [[User talk:RasputinAXP|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FFFFFF"; style="background: maroon;">&nbsp;RasputinAXP&nbsp;</fontspan>]] [[Special:Contributions/RasputinAXP|<small>c</small>]] [[Image:Gadsden_flag.svg|25px]] 00:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

'''Re: Notability''' I read the Wikipedia Notability article and wikipedia and understand that all a software needs is 1 3rd party award to be notable. HFS has 1 3rd party award from www.snapfiles.com in 2004. A 2minute appearance and recommendation by a popular independent media website such as Hak5.org also seems notable. HFS only appears on these websites due to its unique functionality although its growth is among psp and international users instead of within the professional networking crowd. A quick google for "psp hfs" will also show many results. I've also updated some sources and wording on the main "http file server" page. [[User:Rawbanana|Rawbanana]] 09:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)