Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
Line 49:
[[User:Morgansutherland|Morgan Sutherland]] ([[User talk:Morgansutherland|talk]]) 08:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, Wikipedia being the only place to hold information on a subject is not a reason to keep it. Quite the opposite, in fact; Wikipedia being the only source on a topic is a reason to delete that topic.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 02:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per the keep votes above. This article seems to me to meet the general notability guideline. [[User:Sophus Bie|''<fontspan colorstyle="color:#187ba0"; font-size="2px:small;">Sophus Bie</fontspan>'']] <sup>([[User talk:Sophus Bie|talk]])</sup> 09:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per the keep votes above. I believe this article adds value to Wikipedia and should not be removed. Also a [http://blueparen.com/node/6 new article all about Pure] was recently posted on blueparen.com. [[User:mudgen|''<fontspan colorstyle="color:#187ba0"; font-size="2px:small;">mudgen</fontspan>'']] <sup>([[User talk:mudgen|talk]])</sup>
1:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>