Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samuelsen: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:58, 25 May 2022

Latest revision as of 05:05, 3 March 2023

Line 20:

#'''Oppose'''. Not enough experience outside of article editing, most of this type of work can be done by anyone. [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype; font-size:larger;">xaosflux</span>]] [[User_talk:Xaosflux|<sup style="color:#00FF00;">Talk</sup>]]<span style="color:#888888;">/</span>[[Wikipedia:Counter Vandalism Unit|<sub style="color:#666666;">CVU</sub>]] 03:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. That's an impressive length-of-service, and I suppose if he's going to go bad it'd have happened already. But that's not the same as being reasonably-versed in how non-article stuff works, which is what admin work is mostly. Clearly trusted at no.wiki, but en.wiki is not the same (I wouldn't expect to made an admin on no.wiki, after all). Answers to questions are very poor indeed, showing either a lack of real interest, or a lack of understanding about what is expected in an RfA and what it is ''possible'' to offer in the answers; the latter may well extend from not having experience of such possibilities. -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small>^{[[User talk:Splash|talk]]}</small> 04:35, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' as per Xaosflux and Anonymous editor. [[User:Eluchil|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#6B6E85;">Eluchil</fontspan>]] 07:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose'''. same as above[[User:Pschemp|Pschemp]] | [[User talk:Pschemp|Talk]] 15:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' as above. --[[User:Naconkantari|NaconKantari]] ([[User_talk:Naconkantari|話]])|([[Special:Emailuser/Naconkantari|郵便]]) 17:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)