Revision as of 23:41, 6 March 2023 edit Lepricavark (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 1,091,525 edits m →Support: grammar ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:48, 6 March 2023 edit undo Nythar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 152,765 edits →Oppose: @Nythar "I also wasn't referring to myself when I..." [Factotum] Next edit →
Line 255: #::We don't need any more administrators who are OK with "minor" civility violations. Tamzin bludgeoned me, and now you are emboldened to be more aggressive. That is why I oppose administrators who implicitly encourage this behaviour by not taking it seriously. [[User:Chess\|Chess]] ([[User talk:Chess\|talk]]) <small>(please use {{tlx\|reply to\|Chess}} on reply)</small><!--Template:Please ping--> 23:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC) #:::Meh. Two replies to you here isn't bludgeoning. I'll give you a moment to cool down so that you can start normally communicating again.<span id="Nythar:1678145355915:WikipediaFTTCLNRequests_for_adminship/Aoidh" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Nythar\|<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#36454f;">'''Nythar'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Nythar\|💬]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Nythar\|❄️]]) 23:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)</span> #::::I also wasn't referring to myself when I said "editors don't care about maintaining 100% support", although I personally don't care about it either. I was referring to the other editors who replied to Synotia. And I haven't even voted in this RfA.<span id="Nythar:1678146503680:WikipediaFTTCLNRequests_for_adminship/Aoidh" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Nythar\|<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#36454f;">'''Nythar'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Nythar\|💬]]'''-'''[[Special:Contributions/Nythar\|❄️]]) 23:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)</span> #'''Weak Oppose''' per above, and particularly the lack of any attempt to get oppose defenders to quit escalating (see talk page). Between [[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Aoidh#Synotia's_oppose\|the talk page discussion]] and [[Special:Permalink/1143177044#Abuse_of_power_by_the_admin_Maile66\|AN/I discussion]], they had plenty of opportunities to interject to try and de-escalate what eventually culminated in a (short) block for simply !voting against the mob. An admin not willing to speak up when they see something wrong isn't someone I'd want to be an admin. —[[User:Locke Cole\|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole\|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole\|c]] 19:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC) <small>Changed to '''Weak Oppose''' per answer to {{u\|Rosguill}}'s question —[[User:Locke Cole\|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole\|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole\|c]] 23:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)</small> #:I've held off of responding to other inanities above, but RFA candidates are ''strongly'' discouraged from responding to !voters, and are routinely opposed for doing so. Damned if you do and damned if you don't, I suppose. And people wonder why RFA is considered an unpleasant environment. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93\|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93\|Talk]])</span> 21:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aoidh: Difference between revisions