Revision as of 10:31, 11 February 2022 edit Nardog (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors, Temporary account IP viewers 85,709 edits m Reverted 1 edit by 2404:160:8137:8946:5560:F5CE:7605:3D32 (talk) to last revision by Quiddity Tags: Twinkle Undo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:46, 8 March 2023 edit undo Nardog (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors, Temporary account IP viewers 85,709 edits →New script not included: new section Next edit →
Line 18: Cheers, [[User:Quiddity\|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity\|talk]]) 06:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC) == New script not included == Wondered why RefRenamer, which has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22User%3ANardog%2FRefRenamer.js%22+intitle%3A%2F%28common%7Cvector%7Cmonobook%7Cmodern%7Ctimeless%7Ccologneblue%29%5C.js%2F&ns2=1 ~30 users], doesn't show up here, and it looks like it's because it doesn't show up in [https://github.com/siddharthvp/SDZeroBot/blob/master/reports/most-imported-scripts/most-imported-scripts.js#L35 the search] SDZeroBot makes to get the initial list of .js pages, which "should cover every script that has at least 2 backlinks, and many others". I don't care whether my script is included per se, but I'm worried the report might not be accurate or up-to-date. Is <code>incoming_links_desc</code> simply lagging and it will catch up eventually, or is something broken? (cc [[User:SD0001\|SD0001]]) [[User:Nardog\|Nardog]] ([[User talk:Nardog\|talk]]) 10:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:User scripts/Most imported scripts: Difference between revisions