Hierarchy problem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m no need for this
m Disambiguating links to Fine-tuning (link changed to Fine-tuning (physics); link changed to Fine-tuning (physics)) using DisamAssist.
Line 6:
 
==Technical definition==
A hierarchy problem occurs when the fundamental value of some physical parameter, such as a [[coupling constant]] or a mass, in some [[Lagrangian mechanics|Lagrangian]] is vastly different from its effective value, which is the value that gets measured in an experiment. This happens because the effective value is related to the fundamental value by a prescription known as [[renormalization]], which applies corrections to it. Typically the renormalized value of parameters are close to their fundamental values, but in some cases, it appears that there has been a delicate cancellation between the fundamental quantity and the quantum corrections. Hierarchy problems are related to [[fineFine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuning problem]]s and problems of [[naturalness (physics)|naturalness]]. Over the past decade many scientists<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fowlie |first1=Andrew |last2=Balazs |first2=Csaba |last3=White |first3=Graham |last4=Marzola |first4=Luca |last5=Raidal |first5=Martti |date=17 August 2016 |title=Naturalness of the relaxion mechanism |journal=Journal of High Energy Physics |volume=2016 |issue=8 |pages=100 |arxiv=1602.03889 |bibcode=2016JHEP...08..100F |doi=10.1007/JHEP08(2016)100 |s2cid=119102534}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fowlie |first=Andrew |date=10 July 2014 |title=CMSSM, naturalness and the ?fine-tuning price? of the Very Large Hadron Collider |journal=Physical Review D |volume=90 |issue=1 |pages=015010 |arxiv=1403.3407 |bibcode=2014PhRvD..90a5010F |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.90.015010 |s2cid=118362634}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fowlie |first=Andrew |date=15 October 2014 |title=Is the CNMSSM more credible than the CMSSM? |journal=The European Physical Journal C |volume=74 |issue=10 |arxiv=1407.7534 |doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3105-y |s2cid=119304794}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cabrera |first1=Maria Eugenia |last2=Casas |first2=Alberto |last3=Austri |first3=Roberto Ruiz de |last4=Marzola |first4=Luca |last5=Raidal |first5=Martti |year=2009 |title=Bayesian approach and naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC |journal=Journal of High Energy Physics |volume=2009 |issue=3 |page=075 |arxiv=0812.0536 |bibcode=2009JHEP...03..075C |doi=10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/075 |s2cid=18276270}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fichet |first=S. |date=18 December 2012 |title=Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics |journal=Physical Review D |volume=86 |issue=12 |pages=125029 |arxiv=1204.4940 |bibcode=2012PhRvD..86l5029F |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.86.125029 |s2cid=119282331}}</ref> argued that the hierarchy problem is a specific application of [[Bayesian statistics]].
 
Studying [[renormalization]] in hierarchy problems is difficult, because such quantum corrections are usually power-law divergent, which means that the shortest-distance physics are most important. Because we do not know the precise details of the [[quantum gravity|shortest-distance theory of physics]], we cannot even address how this delicate cancellation between two large terms occurs. Therefore, researchers are led to postulate new physical phenomena that resolve hierarchy problems without fine-tuning.
Line 26:
[[File:Hqmc-vector.svg|thumb|300px|right|Cancellation of the [[Higgs boson]] quadratic [[mass renormalization]] between [[fermion]]ic [[top quark]] loop and [[scalar field|scalar]] stop [[squark]] tadpole [[Feynman diagram]]s in a [[supersymmetry|supersymmetric]] extension of the [[Standard Model]]]]
 
More technically, the question is why the [[Higgs boson]] is so much lighter than the [[Planck mass]] (or the [[grand unification energy]], or a heavy neutrino mass scale): one would expect that the large quantum contributions to the square of the Higgs boson mass would inevitably make the mass huge, comparable to the scale at which new physics appears unless there is an incredible [[Fine-tuning (physics)|fine-tuning]] cancellation between the quadratic radiative corrections and the bare mass.
 
The problem cannot even be formulated in the strict context of the Standard Model, for the Higgs mass cannot be calculated. In a sense, the problem amounts to the worry that a future theory of fundamental particles, in which the Higgs boson mass will be calculable, should not have excessive fine-tunings.