Talk:Process modeling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:07, 21 March 2011

Revision as of 19:54, 13 March 2023

Line 30:

[[User:Telgeniaal|Telgeniaal]] 10:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

:Update to the comment above. The request was to keep things seperate that are not, in fact, seperate. I interpret this to mean "seperate these" things --[[User:Nickmalik|Nickmalik]] ([[User talk:Nickmalik|talk]]) 16:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)</blockquote>

'''Keep separate.''' The [[Process modeling]] page is general, and this is one of only several meanings/contexts. In order to keep [[Process modeling|that page]] from becoming overlong, this article is best kept individual IMHO. [[User:Davidbspalding|David Spalding]]&nbsp;(<big><fontspan colorstyle="color: darkred;">[[User talk:Davidbspalding|<span style="color: darkred;">☎</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:Emailuser/Davidbspalding|<span style="color: darkred;">✉</span>]]&nbsp;[[Special:contributions/davidbspalding|<span style="color: darkred;">✍</span>]]</fontspan></big>) 16:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

::Business Process Modeling (BPM) should be kept seperate. While there are obvious commonalities, BPM must take into account human factors and constraints. I, for one, have argued that BPM does not go far enough in taking human constraints into account. Anyone interested in this point of view should contact me directly for the recently releases white paper, "Improving the Business Process Model." --mlefcowitz 11:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mlefcowitz|Mlefcowitz]] ([[User talk:Mlefcowitz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mlefcowitz|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->