Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 8:
:I, too, though, commend you for attempting to improve the draft. You're getting somewhere. [[User:LVDP01|LVDP01]] ([[User talk:LVDP01|talk]]) 20:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks Sirfurboy for the input. I can see your perspective, but think the 2nd statement was offering proof of the first statement. Thus it seems like we are caught in a circular catch-22. The section is C translation. Simply stating that, offers no context to the reader. The statements below are expanding on what that means in respect to features of the V language. Thus, "V can translate your entire C project and offer you the safety, simplicity, and compilation speed-up (via modules)." But now is that statement merely a claim or a fact? There for the next statement and link are proof of the claim, "Translating DOOM from C to V and building it takes less than a second." Furthermore, V is not selling anything by this. That it can quickly translate a C program to V, is a proven statement, that is backed up by visual proof.
:Don't get me wrong, I'm perfect fine with us removing statements, to not look like advertising or promotional content. But worried that then, the next editor can purposely take the position that statements are mere claims without merit or proof.
:How about this?
Line 21:
:Translation for Go and JavaScript are already under development[4]}}
[[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 23:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
| |||