:I, too, though, commend you for attempting to improve the draft. You're getting somewhere. [[User:LVDP01|LVDP01]] ([[User talk:LVDP01|talk]]) 20:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks Sirfurboy for the input. I can see your perspective, but aren't the 2nd and 3rd statements offering proof of the first statement above it? Each link, is placed to verify the validity of the statement. Thus it seems like we are caught in a circular catch-22. The section is C translation. Simply stating that, offers no context to the reader. The statements below are expanding on what that means in respect to features of the V language. Thus, "V can translate your entire C project and offer you the safety, simplicity, and compilation speed-up (via modules)." But now is that statement merely a claim or a fact? Therefore the next statement and link are proof of the claim, "Translating DOOM from C to V and building it takes less than a second." Furthermore, V is not selling anything by this. There is no product. That it can quickly translate a C program to V, is a proven statement, that is backed up by visual proof.
:Don't get me wrong, I'm perfect fine with us removing statements, to not look like advertising or promotional content, or rewording statements with flowery sales-like language. But worried that then,removal theof nextkey editorexplanatory statements, can purposelylead taketo the next editor taking a position that statements are mere claims without merit or proof.
