Revision as of 18:09, 19 January 2006 edit Tony Sidaway (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 81,722 edits →Concerns over personal attack templates: Thank you. In case I archive the talk page, the diff is here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tony_Sidaway&diff=35282601&oldid=3526554 ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:17, 19 March 2023 edit undo Legobot (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,703,984 edits m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x) Tag: Fixed lint errors
Line 9: What are your views of the proposed [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:User_Bill_of_Rights&oldid=33628435 User Bill of Rights]? --<~~font color~~span style="color: darkred;"><~~font face~~span style="font-family: georgia;">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky\|<span style="color: darkred;">HK</span>]]</~~font~~span></~~font~~span> 16:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC) :Thanks for your question [[User:Herschelkrustofsky\|HK]]. I would say that there should be guidelines such as these so that users and arbitrators both know where they stand. In a nutshell, I would say that some Wikipedia processes have become quite complex as the project has evolved, creating a gulf between the 'normal' user and those who know their way round well. This brings about the danger of elitism, to counter that I would support some clearly defined users' rights, along with accountability for arbitrators.

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/RomaC: Difference between revisions